← BACK TO $NFLX
The claim

“Netflix is undervalued with a P/E of 22 for double-digit growth, sticky business, strong free cash flow, and intrinsic value supporting a 10%+ return.”

Why he says it — point by point

FAVORABLE & AGAINST · BOTH KEPT

Why

But the P ratio 22 for a company still growing at double digits. This is getting interesting.

support · 22×

the subscription is very sticky

Still 13% growth over the year.

free cash flows are usually at 75 80% of net income

intrinsic value is 56 still a little bit below 68 for a 10% expected return

support · $56

Netflix is now undervalued for a 10% return.

Risk

one hit to the net income versus free cash flow situation but that is because of taxes and what was it the Warner Bros situation

growth has slowed they're trying different things free trials and then we'll see what gets traction

intense sector competition

Absence of major content hits

The structured call

Direction
Bullish
Catalyst
Target

The receipt

YouTube · 0:140:14

“Netflix is undervalued with a P/E of 22 for double-digit growth, sticky business, strong free cash flow, and intrinsic value supporting a 10%+ return.”

From "Netflix Stock Crash Makes It a Much Better Buy!"
Open the source at 0:14 →

Publish-day price $$68.67 · the claim is anchored to the moment it was said.

Value Investing with Sven Carlin, Ph.D. on $NFLX, over time

Full profile →

How this voice has moved on the ticker. We flag contradictions — as behavior, never a score.

This is the only tracked claim from this analyst on the ticker so far.

This receipt is public & free — always.
The full stance archive and CSV export are part of your trial.
This is a record of what one analyst said on one thesis, with the clip — not a recommendation, not a verdict, not a score. The opposing case is linked above.