Latest analyst takes
InvestAnswersBEARQYLD is a bad deal for dividend-chasing because the NAV decay is substantial and the total return versus QQQ is “garbage,” making it a negative-trade structure over time.21h ago
Dividend BullBEARQYLD is mentioned as an older Global X-style covered-call option on an income-first model, but my preference has shifted to index covered-call funds I think offer better NAV protection.9d ago
GenExDividendInvestorBULLI own QYLD as a high-cashflow option-income ETF, generating about $13,600 per year (around $1,100 per month), even though I’m aware of the structure’s trade-offs.16d ago"QYLD is a bad deal for dividend-chasing because the NAV decay is substantial and the total return versus QQQ is “garbage,” making it a negative-trade structure over time."
"QYLD is mentioned as an older Global X-style covered-call option on an income-first model, but my preference has shifted to index covered-call funds I think offer better NAV protection."
"I own QYLD as a high-cashflow option-income ETF, generating about $13,600 per year (around $1,100 per month), even though I’m aware of the structure’s trade-offs."