QBTS jumped 12.4% on June 15, 2026 — who was aligned with the move
6 analysts had active stances on QBTS in the 90 days before this move. Here's where each one landed.
What each analyst said before the move
D-Wave’s risk/reward improves versus prior highs, and the better setup is buying in the high teens.
Stance expressed 5 days before this move
QBTS has a bullish near-term road map: after consolidation, it can work up toward $46.80 once it regains the upper levels.
Stance expressed 12 days before this move
QBTS is bullish with a nice weekly 1-2-3 and a rounded base, but the stop size is the main drawback.
Stance expressed 14 days before this move
QBTS is the most “optionality” friendly pick because it already has paying customers for quantum annealing and is extending into a more general gate-based platform via the Quantum Circuits acquisition, supported by accelerating bookings even while margins remain early-stage.
Stance expressed 48 days before this move
QBTS is no longer worth holding — selling and taking the loss signals the stop-out decision.
Stance expressed 11 days before this move
QBTS looks fundamentally overhyped and speculative, with 56% downside potential and losses despite a $2 billion government-investment headline.
Stance expressed 24 days before this move
What happened next
- 1-day after the move: QBTS continued in the same direction as the initial signal.
- 7-day trajectory: further price action on QBTS is tracked on TradingView.
- 30-day outlook: TickerReceipts tracks analyst accuracy over time as positions resolve.
Frequently asked questions
Which analysts were bullish on QBTS before the June 15, 2026 move?
TickerReceipts tracked 4 analysts who held bullish (aligned) stances on QBTS in the 90-day window before the June 15, 2026 price move. These analysts had expressed positions consistent with the move direction — bullish before an upward move, or bearish before a downward move. Their stances are listed above with the number of days each position was held. This data reflects only publicly trackable statements captured in TickerReceipts' database and is not financial advice.
Which analysts were against the QBTS June 15, 2026 move?
2 analysts held stances that went against the QBTS June 15, 2026 price move. For an upward move, against-stances were bearish; for a downward move, against-stances were bullish. Being against a single-day move does not invalidate a thesis — analysts may hold longer-term views that diverge from short-term price action. TickerReceipts records these stances for transparency and historical accuracy tracking.
Did any analyst flip their stance on QBTS just before this move?
TickerReceipts monitors stance changes in the 14 days preceding each price event. For the QBTS June 15, 2026 move, 0 analyst stance changes were recorded close to the event date. A flip is defined as a tracked analyst switching their expressed stance from bull to bear or vice versa. Flips near major price events are notable signals, though timing alone does not confirm predictive intent.